Fixing the Fee Fog and Fine-Tuning PayPal

Enhancing P2P Transaction Experience through Transparent Fee Previews and Improved Payment Navigation

MENTOR

Marzieh Nadali

Marzieh Nadali

TEAM

2 Product Designers

2 Product Designers

DURATION

3 Weeks Nov 2024

3 Weeks Nov 2024

OVERVIEW

PayPal's P2P transactions are plagued by issues that create confusion, hinder trust, and lead to frustration and drop-offs.

ROLE

UI/UX Design

UI/UX Design

OBJECTIVES

  • Increase user satisfaction

  • Encourage users to utilise P2P services more frequently

  • Boosting overall platform engagement and customer retention

IMPACT

We focused on improved fee transparency, efficiency, and user confidence in PayPal transactions.

  • 67% Increase in User Satisfaction: Experience rating rose from 5.2/10 to 8.7/10.

  • 100% Fee Comprehension: All users correctly identified transaction costs before confirmation (up from 30%).

METHODS

  • User Interviews

  • Competitive analysis

  • Affinity Diagram

  • Persona

  • HMW

  • Crazy 8

  • Impact-Effort Matrix

  • User Feedback

INDUSTRY

Finance

DURATION

3 Weeks Nov 2024

TEAM

2 Product Designers

INTRODUCTION

It all started with a question when I wanted to pay my mentor. ”Do you mind if I pay another way? PayPal is so confusing!”

That was the moment I stopped and asked myself, why don’t I like PayPal? This simple question sparked a deeper curiosity: Was it just me, or were others struggling with PayPal too?

app design chart
app design chart
app design chart
app design chart

social activists

Insurance companies

Rehab Centers

Hospitals

Suppliers

Media

Scholars

Indirect stakeholders

Doctors

Municipalities

The government

SCI Families

SCI patients

direct stakeholders

SCI Partners & Caregivers

core Stakeholders

PROBLEM

PayPal's P2P transactions are plagued by issues that create confusion, hinder trust, and lead to frustration and drop-offs.

According to our research, users face challenges that erode trust and usability, resulting in transaction frustration and lower engagement.

"The partner had to cope with the shock, support the injured partner during the institutionalized rehabilitation, and struggle to make their relationship and life together function again."

"They were struck by the brutal fact that their partner had been seriously injured, and their own needs faded into the background."

"The partners experienced much distress and appreciated the support they got but felt that they were mainly left to manage the difficult process on their own."

(Johnson et al.)

WHAT USERS SAY?

+6 user interviews revealed the difficulty of use and lack of transparency when making P2P transactions.

Themes started to emerge after we mapped all the insights. These were the most shown themes, which gave us solid ground to further plan our process.

User1:

Some of its options are not clear at all and not easy to find at first, like the request button, send again, and PayPal balance on the home page.

User 2:

I believe It is messy! There is a lot of possibility of doing a wrong transaction on the app, much more than other finance apps.

User2:

I had money transferred that was $10, but for some reason I got a fee for it. Why did I get a fee? I never got fees before.

User 5:

I am not so satisfied with PayPal. It does have too much info on it and makes it very confusing.

WHy it matters?

PayPal's usability issues are driving users away, damaging its reputation, and amplifying frustration in public discussions.

By optimizing these elements, PayPal can increase user satisfaction, improve transaction completion rates, and encourage users to utilize P2P services more frequently, ultimately boosting overall platform engagement and customer retention.

WHy it matters?

app design cards
app design cards
app design cards
app design cards

insights

The interviews revealed the need to work on the transparency, navigation, and payment flexibility in the P2P transactiona.

What users say

Conducting 5 usability tests, we discovered the painpoints of the users that validated some of the issues found in the Heuristics Evaluation.

Number of participants: 5

Age range: 60 to 75 years old

Average age: ~67 years

Gender : 3 Female, 2 Male

Demographics

Task 1: Set 2 goals in the application.
Task 2: Tell me your plans for 3 days from now.
Task 3: Change one of the goals you have.

Task 4: Find where you can see the reports.
Task 5: Log out of your account, please.

  • How was your experience using this application?

  • Have you ever used an application to build new habits regarding your diet or physical activity? Name them.

  • How do you think an application can help you build new habits?

  • Do you have any suggestions that might help us improve this application?

Tasks

Results

What users say

Conducting 5 usability tests, we discovered the painpoints of the users that validated some of the issues found in the Heuristics Evaluation.

Demographics

Number of participants: 5

Number of participants: 5

Age range: 60 to 75 years old

Age range: 60 to 75 years old

Average age: ~67 years

Average age: ~67 years

Gender : 3 Female, 2 Male

Gender : 3 Female, 2 Male

Tasks

Task 1: Set 2 goals in the application.
Task 2: Tell me your plans for 3 days from now.
Task 3: Change one of the goals you have.

Task 4: Find where you can see the reports.
Task 5: Log out of your account, please.

Task 1: Set 2 goals in the application.
Task 2: Tell me your plans for 3 days from now.
Task 3: Change one of the goals you have.

Task 4: Find where you can see the reports.
Task 5: Log out of your account, please.

  • How was your experience using this application?

  • Have you ever used an application to build new habits regarding your diet or physical activity? Name them.

  • How do you think an application can help you build new habits?

  • Do you have any suggestions that might help us improve this application?

  • How was your experience using this application?

  • Have you ever used an application to build new habits regarding your diet or physical activity? Name them.

  • How do you think an application can help you build new habits?

  • Do you have any suggestions that might help us improve this application?

Results

Results

For whom?

Who struggles?

There are two types of users using PayPal for P2P transactions: one is frequent users seeking efficiency, and the other is infrequent users seeking transparency based on gathered insights.

Patterns in researching our target audience showed two main archetypes.

We looked into patterns of needs, pain points, and goals of the users.
There are two types of users using PayPal for P2P transactions: one is frequent users seeking efficiency, and the other is infrequent users seeking transparency based on gathered insights through desk research and user interviews.

How the competitors handle it?

Competitive analysis indicates that PayPal falls short in many aspects compared to modern fintech apps such as Revolut, Wise, and Skrill.

To address the problems we identified, we analyzed popular fintech apps used for P2P transactions, such as Revolut, Wise, & Skrill.
Here are the summaries and in-detail analyses of them.

  • To address the problems we identified, we analyzed popular fintech apps used for P2P transactions, such as Revolut, Wise, & Skrill.
    Here are the summaries and in-detail analyses of them.

Revolut
Wise
Skrill
  1. Direct access to core features

  • Revolut's hierarchical structure ensures that key actions (Add Money, Exchange) are easily at reach.

  • Contact search is versatile and dynamic, offering categorisation and search by multiple identifiers (phone, @username, email).

  1. Fee & Exchange rate Transparency

  • Revolut only presents fees at the point of transaction, keeping the interface uncluttered while ensuring that fees are clearly broken down before confirmation.

  • The order review step reinforces trust by ensuring users understand the total amount, fees, and conversion rates.

  1. Easy Access to core Actions

  • Wise's homepage structure ensures that key actions (Send, Request, Add Money) and the most needed functionalities are easily within reach.

  1. Increased user awareness prior to, during, and after the transaction

  1. No surprises at checkout with clear and upfront fees.

  • Deductibles and fees are displayed at every stage, reinforcing trust and eliminating uncertainty. Whether it’s currency exchange, transfer fees, or payment breakdowns, Wise makes sure the user never encounters hidden costs.

  1. Increased user awareness prior to, during, and after the transaction

  1. Easy Access to core Actions

  • Wise's homepage structure ensures that key actions (Send, Request, Add Money) and the most needed functionalities are easily within reach.

  1. Increased user awareness prior to, during, and after the transaction

  1. No surprises at checkout with clear and upfront fees.

  • Deductibles and fees are displayed at every stage, reinforcing trust and eliminating uncertainty. Whether it’s currency exchange, transfer fees, or payment breakdowns, Wise makes sure the user never encounters hidden costs.

  1. Direct access to core features

  • Revolut's hierarchical structure ensures that key actions (Add Money, Exchange) are easily at reach.

  • Contact search is versatile and dynamic, offering categorisation and search by multiple identifiers (phone, @username, email).

  1. Fee & Exchange rate Transparency

  • Revolut only presents fees at the point of transaction, keeping the interface uncluttered while ensuring that fees are clearly broken down before confirmation.

  • The order review step reinforces trust by ensuring users understand the total amount, fees, and conversion rates.

IDEATION, which idea fits best?

Afetr an ideation session using the crazy 8 method, we found the following ideas the most feasible ones based on their impact and effort.

Our mentor also joined us and voted on the best ideas and we have decided to work on the ideas in the next chapter.

  • To address the problems we identified, we analyzed popular fintech apps used for P2P transactions, such as Revolut, Wise, & Skrill.
    Here are the summaries and in-detail analyses of them.

HOW WE ADDRESSED THE ISSUES

  1. Improving Clarity, Navigation, and User Control

  1. Providing users with Clarity and Control

The new homepage simplifies navigation by placing key financial actions—Transfer, Exchange, and Add Money—at the centre of the screen.

  • Old Homepage

❝ Some options feel buried inside menus—I just want to send money quickly. ❞

❝ On PayPal, some options are not clear at all and are not easy to find at first, like adding to my balance or exchange rates when sending internationally. ❞

❝ I have ADHD and I have problems finding options on this app a lot. It takes too long to find what I need, especially when I’m in a hurry. ❞

  1. The homepage was cluttered with "Send Again" suggestions and promotional banners (e.g., "Refer a friend").

  1. Essential features like "Add Money" and "Exchange" were missing from the homepage.

  1. The balance was shown, but with no alerts or guidance for next steps.

  1. The homepage was cluttered with "Send Again" suggestions and promotional banners (e.g., "Refer a friend").

  1. Essential features like "Add Money" and "Exchange" were missing from the homepage.

  1. The balance was shown, but with no alerts or guidance for next steps.

  • New Homepage

  1. Key payment actions (Transfer, Exchange, Add Money) are prominently displayed at the top, reducing friction.

  1. Alerts provide proactive notifications for users to manage their balance.

  1. The homepage is cleaner, with a focus on transactions rather than promotions.

  • Old Payment screen

  • Old Payment screen

❝ I wish I didn’t have to see the profile and photo of people I sent money to once a year ago—it makes it hard to focus on what I need to do.❞

❝ At first, I was really confused about how to do transactions, but after a while, it became easier. It shouldn’t take this long to figure out.❞

  1. The navigation was cluttered, with a mix of frequent contacts and payment options displayed in a less structured way.

  1. The “More Options” section made core actions feel secondary.

  1. The navigation was cluttered, with a mix of frequent contacts and payment options displayed in a less structured way.

  1. The “More Options” section made core actions feel secondary.

  1. The navigation was cluttered, with a mix of frequent contacts and payment options displayed in a less structured way.

  1. The “More Options” section made core actions feel secondary.

  • New Payment screen

  • New Payment screen

  1. We organized options more clearly. Payment actions like "Send," "Bill," "Give," and "Request" are tabbed at the top, making it easier for users to find and switch between different payment methods

  1. Icon colors are changed to reduce distractions, and layout changes help reduce cognitive load.

  1. Enhancing Fee Visibility & Transparency To Avoid Surprises

For many PayPal users, transaction costs felt like a guessing game. Fees were often buried in the process, only appearing at the final step, leaving users frustrated and unsure of the total amount they would be charged. Without a clear breakdown, users lacked control over their payment choices, sometimes unknowingly selecting options with higher fees.


Our redesign changes that by surfacing fee details at multiple touchpoints—during payment method selection, transaction review, and confirmation—ensuring users stay informed every step of the way. Now, users can compare costs upfront, avoid surprises, and make confident financial decisions with ease.

❝ I just had money transferred that was $10, but for some reason I got a fee for it. Why did I get a fee? I never got fees before. ❞

❝ Trying to send 120 pounds to England, but the app kept asking for extra money due to unclear fees.❞

  • Unclear fee in the Old design

  • Unclear fee in the Old design

  • Fee clarity in the new design

  • Fee clarity in the new design

  1. We surfaced the fee breakdown at multiple points throughout the transaction process to ensure users are continuously aware of the cost.

  1. From selecting the payment method to the final review screen, fees are clearly displayed—including PayPal fees, exchange rates, and total payment amount.

  1. Users can compare different payment methods and their associated costs before proceeding.

  • Old send money screen

  • Old send money screen

❝ Sometimes I don’t realize I need to add money until the last step. ❞

  1. The original design only allows the user to enter an amount with a small currency selector next to it. The exchange rate is only visible later in the process.

  1. The screen doesn’t show the user’s available balance, making it unclear whether they need to add funds.

  • New Send money screen

  • New Send money screen

  1. The redesigned screen shows both the sender’s and recipient’s currency right from the start, along with the exchange rate. This prevents surprises about conversion rates later in the flow.

  1. Our design displays the PayPal balance directly below the amount field, making it easy to see if a top-up is needed.

  1. Removing the Uncertainty in Currency Conversion

Understanding exchange rates shouldn’t need a blind trust. In the previous design, users saw only the current exchange rate at the moment of transaction, without any historical context or clear differentiation between conversion fees and actual rates. This lack of transparency led to confusion and discrepancies in the final transaction amount.

With our updated design, users now have access to real-time exchange rate trends. Additionally, we’ve separated exchange rate fees from transaction costs, making it clear how much users are paying for the conversion itself. This helps users make informed decisions about when to send money, ensuring they get the best possible value.

❝ I did not know if the fee is from PayPal or the exchange rate itself.❞

❝ I don’t want to guess if it’s a good time to send money, I need to see how rates have changed before I decide.❞

The old screen (left) shows only the static exchange rate at the moment of the transaction. Users must trust that they are getting a fair rate without any context.



The old screen (left) shows only the static exchange rate at the moment of the transaction. Users must trust that they are getting a fair rate without any context.

The redesigned screen introduces a graph displaying historical exchange rate trends, giving users insight into fluctuations over time (weekly, monthly, and annually).

Users only see the exchange rate without a clear indication of how it affects fees or the final amount.

The new version explicitly separates the exchange rate and any additional fees, ensuring users understand what they’re paying for.

  1. The redesigned screen shows both the sender’s and recipient’s currency right from the start, along with the exchange rate. This prevents surprises about conversion rates later in the flow.

  1. Our design displays the PayPal balance directly below the amount field, making it easy to see if a top-up is needed.

  1. Introducing A "Schedule Payments" Feature

❝ I wish there was a feature that allowed me to set up recurring payments, like paying someone every 5th of the month.❞

❝ It would be great if there was an option to schedule payments.❞

Some sections are still under construction. Thank you for your patience.

Want to know more ASAP?

Technicalities

Technicalities

Font size, colors, and text spacing have a significant effect on the rate of accuracy of a visual search and the reaction time during each search period.

Font size, colors, and text spacing have a significant effect on the rate of accuracy of a visual search and the reaction time during each search period.

When designing the information, on-glance legibility was an important thing to consider, as the surgeons, doctors, and nurses would use the screen as a fast means of retrieving information. Their attention is limited, so the cognitive load had to be minimal. High contrast was used to display quantitative physiology data such as HR and SpO₂ numbers.

The dark background is scientifically proven to have better results when paired with high-contrast colored numbers. Each physiology indicator was assigned a color based on conventions observed through patient monitoring systems. A proper font and size balance was also achieved by using a bold Helvetica weight commonly used with modern patient monitoring systems.

When designing the information, on-glance legibility was an important thing to consider, as the surgeons, doctors, and nurses would use the screen as a fast means of retrieving information. Their attention is limited, so the cognitive load had to be minimal. High contrast was used to display quantitative physiology data such as HR and SpO₂ numbers.

The dark background is scientifically proven to have better results when paired with high-contrast colored numbers. Each physiology indicator was assigned a color based on conventions observed through patient monitoring systems. A proper font and size balance was also achieved by using a bold Helvetica weight commonly used with modern patient monitoring systems.

User perception

The role of human and clinical judgment in our AI feature was heavily criticized.

The role of human and clinical judgment in our AI feature was heavily criticized.

User testing revealed how our product was perceived positively by medical personnel. Most claimed to understand what it does, and what it aims to solve. However, the AI prediction concept was underdeveloped, as many did not understand the need for it, let alone how it worked.

The interface

A great fintech app feels secure, provides full financial clarity, and minimizes friction. If an app is trustworthy, clear, and efficient, users will engage with confidence—and keep coming back.
So I have learned that fintech apps MUST prioritize transparency without adding friction to the user experience.

A great fintech app feels secure, provides full financial clarity, and minimizes friction. If an app is trustworthy, clear, and efficient, users will engage with confidence—and keep coming back.
So I have learned that fintech apps MUST prioritize transparency without adding friction to the user experience.

  1. Giving users more control over their financial experiences enhances engagement and ensures higher user satisfaction.

Users have different financial behaviors—some prefer speed, others prioritize control. A well-designed fintech app should adapt to different user needs.

Users have different financial behaviors—some prefer speed, others prioritize control. A well-designed fintech app should adapt to different user needs.

  1. The reduction of decision fatigue can be achieved by appropriate timing.

Financial decisions require confidence, but when too much information is presented at once, it can overwhelm users rather than empower them. Instead of forcing users to process everything upfront, breaking details into digestible, well-timed steps allows them to focus on what matters in the moment—whether it’s understanding fees, choosing the best payment method, or reviewing their final transaction.

Financial decisions require confidence, but when too much information is presented at once, it can overwhelm users rather than empower them. Instead of forcing users to process everything upfront, breaking details into digestible, well-timed steps allows them to focus on what matters in the moment—whether it’s understanding fees, choosing the best payment method, or reviewing their final transaction.

  1. Fintech products must continuously evolve to meet user expectations and remain competitive in a rapidly changing landscape.

While PayPal is a widely recognized platform, competitors like Revolut and Wise have set new standards, especially in fee transparency and frictionless transactions. It seems that PayPal excels in onboarding and user acquisition but struggles with user retention due to friction in navigation, hidden fees, and a lack of personalization.

While PayPal is a widely recognized platform, competitors like Revolut and Wise have set new standards, especially in fee transparency and frictionless transactions. It seems that PayPal excels in onboarding and user acquisition but struggles with user retention due to friction in navigation, hidden fees, and a lack of personalization.

hOW IS THE NEW EXPERIENCE?

Conducting another round of user tests with a similar scenario as before, helped me gather insights on our first designed version, leading to iterations on it.

After preparing the figma prototype, I had it tested with more users and gathered insights and feedback.

The interface

A great fintech app feels secure, provides full financial clarity, and minimizes friction. If an app is trustworthy, clear, and efficient, users will engage with confidence—and keep coming back.
So I have learned that fintech apps MUST prioritize transparency without adding friction to the user experience.

A great fintech app feels secure, provides full financial clarity, and minimizes friction. If an app is trustworthy, clear, and efficient, users will engage with confidence—and keep coming back.
So I have learned that fintech apps MUST prioritize transparency without adding friction to the user experience.

  1. Giving users more control over their financial experiences enhances engagement and ensures higher user satisfaction.

Users have different financial behaviors—some prefer speed, others prioritize control. A well-designed fintech app should adapt to different user needs.

Users have different financial behaviors—some prefer speed, others prioritize control. A well-designed fintech app should adapt to different user needs.

  1. The reduction of decision fatigue can be achieved by appropriate timing.

Financial decisions require confidence, but when too much information is presented at once, it can overwhelm users rather than empower them. Instead of forcing users to process everything upfront, breaking details into digestible, well-timed steps allows them to focus on what matters in the moment—whether it’s understanding fees, choosing the best payment method, or reviewing their final transaction.

Financial decisions require confidence, but when too much information is presented at once, it can overwhelm users rather than empower them. Instead of forcing users to process everything upfront, breaking details into digestible, well-timed steps allows them to focus on what matters in the moment—whether it’s understanding fees, choosing the best payment method, or reviewing their final transaction.

  1. Fintech products must continuously evolve to meet user expectations and remain competitive in a rapidly changing landscape.

While PayPal is a widely recognized platform, competitors like Revolut and Wise have set new standards, especially in fee transparency and frictionless transactions. It seems that PayPal excels in onboarding and user acquisition but struggles with user retention due to friction in navigation, hidden fees, and a lack of personalization.

While PayPal is a widely recognized platform, competitors like Revolut and Wise have set new standards, especially in fee transparency and frictionless transactions. It seems that PayPal excels in onboarding and user acquisition but struggles with user retention due to friction in navigation, hidden fees, and a lack of personalization.

Still working on the rest of the case study …

Want to know more ASAP?

Still working on the rest of the case study …

Want to know more ASAP?

Technicalities

Font size, colors, and text spacing have a significant effect on the rate of accuracy of a visual search and the reaction time during each search period.

When designing the information, on-glance legibility was an important thing to consider, as the surgeons, doctors, and nurses would use the screen as a fast means of retrieving information. Their attention is limited, so the cognitive load had to be minimal. High contrast was used to display quantitative physiology data such as HR and SpO₂ numbers.

The dark background is scientifically proven to have better results when paired with high-contrast colored numbers. Each physiology indicator was assigned a color based on conventions observed through patient monitoring systems. A proper font and size balance was also achieved by using a bold Helvetica weight commonly used with modern patient monitoring systems.

Technicalities

Font size, colors, and text spacing have a significant effect on the rate of accuracy of a visual search and the reaction time during each search period.

When designing the information, on-glance legibility was an important thing to consider, as the surgeons, doctors, and nurses would use the screen as a fast means of retrieving information. Their attention is limited, so the cognitive load had to be minimal. High contrast was used to display quantitative physiology data such as HR and SpO₂ numbers.

The dark background is scientifically proven to have better results when paired with high-contrast colored numbers. Each physiology indicator was assigned a color based on conventions observed through patient monitoring systems. A proper font and size balance was also achieved by using a bold Helvetica weight commonly used with modern patient monitoring systems.